Beyond the Benefit of the Doubt

Sources

References

Across the project, 14 peer-reviewed publications and 12 legal authorities are cited. The 20-source core research synthesis uses 10 of each. Four more peer-reviewed publications, two more legal authorities, and eight other books, sources, and tools support other sections. Three project creation tools are disclosed separately and are not included in those source counts.

Core peer-reviewed research synthesis sources (10)

  • Alahmari, A. (2019). A review and synthesis of the response to intervention (RtI) literature: Teachers' implementations and perceptions. International Journal of Special Education, 33(4), 894-909. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1219496
  • Brown-Chidsey, R. (2024). MTSS in the classroom: Special education teachers' experiences with a multi-tiered system of supports. Exceptionality, 32(5), 349-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2024.2389073
  • Cosier, M., Causton-Theoharis, J., & Theoharis, G. (2013). Does access matter? Time in general education and achievement for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34(6), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513485448
  • Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
  • Fuchs, D., Mirowitz, H. C., & Gilbert, J. K. (2023). Exploring the truth of Michael Yudin's claim: The more time students with disabilities spend in general classrooms, the better they do academically. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 33(4), 236-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073221097713
  • Gates, L. K., Fischetti, J. C., & Moody, A. (2013). Implementing and monitoring the response to intervention process: The special educator perspective. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 20-47. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.196
  • Kurth, J. A., Ruppar, A. L., Toews, S. G., McCabe, K. M., McQueston, J. A., & Johnston, R. (2019). Considerations in placement decisions for students with extensive support needs: An analysis of LRE statements. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918825479
  • Sayeski, K. L., Reno, E. A., & Thoele, J. M. (2023). Specially designed instruction: Operationalizing the delivery of special education services. Exceptionality, 31(3), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2022.2158087
  • Werts, M. G., Carpenter, E. S., & Fewell, C. (2014). Barriers and benefits to response to intervention: Perceptions of special education teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 33(2), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051403300202
  • Yell, M. L., & Bradley, M. R. (2025). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Clarifying the relationship between free appropriate public education and least restrictive environment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 58(4), 246-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194241305352
  • Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
  • 34 C.F.R. section 300.115 (2006).
  • California Education Code section 56361 (2004).
  • Deal v. Hamilton County Board of Education, 392 F.3d 840 (6th Cir. 2004).
  • Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District RE-1, 580 U.S. 386 (2017).
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. section 1400 et seq. (2006).
  • Larry P. v. Riles, 793 F.2d 969 (9th Cir. 1984).
  • Oberti v. Board of Education, 995 F.2d 1204 (3d Cir. 1993).
  • Sacramento City Unified School District v. Rachel H., 14 F.3d 1398 (9th Cir. 1994).
  • Timothy O. v. Paso Robles Unified School District, 822 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2016).

Additional peer-reviewed publications (4)

  • Gaspar, C. R., & Sahay, D. (2025). Expanding the concept of parent involvement to special education: Considerations for inclusivity. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 17(3), 423-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12634
  • Lawrence, B. C., Hudson Breen, R. E., Lazinski, M., & Harrison, G. L. (2026). Hope as an organizing framework for family-school collaboration. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 41(1), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735261431416
  • Mueller, T. G. (2009). IEP facilitation: A promising approach to resolving conflicts between families and schools. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(3), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990904100307
  • Summers, J. A., Hoffman, L., Marquis, J., Turnbull, A., Poston, D., & Nelson, L. L. (2005). Measuring the quality of family-professional partnerships in special education services. Exceptional Children, 72(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507200104
  • California Education Code section 56301 (2026).
  • California Education Code section 56040.1 (2007).

Other books, resources, and tools (8)

  • CADRE. (n.d.). About IEP facilitation. Center for Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Education. https://cadreworks.org/facilitation-programs/about-iep-facilitation
  • Friend, M. (2020). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (9th ed.). Pearson.
  • High Quality IEPs. (2024). Understanding procedural and substantive requirements. https://highqualityieps.net/
  • High Quality IEPs. (2026). Creating self-awareness: Special education provider edition. https://highqualityieps.net/
  • IRIS Center. (n.d.). Family engagement: Collaborating with families of students with disabilities. Vanderbilt University. https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/fam/
  • Losen, D. J., & Orfield, G. (Eds.). (2002). Racial inequity in special education. Harvard Education Press.
  • Tatum, B. D. (2008). Cultivating the trust of Black parents. In M. Pollock (Ed.), Everyday antiracism: Getting real about race in school (pp. 310-313). The New Press.
  • Tatum, B. D. (2008). Defining racism. In M. Pollock (Ed.), Everyday antiracism: Getting real about race in school (pp. 7-11). The New Press.

Project creation tools (3)

  • Anthropic. (2025). Claude [Large language model]. https://claude.ai
  • Google. (2025). Google NotebookLM [Large language model]. https://notebooklm.google.com
  • Grammarly. (2025). Grammarly [AI writing assistant]. https://www.grammarly.com

This website is a capstone project and educational resource intended to support learning and collaboration.It is not legal advice and does not replace applicable laws, district policy, school procedures, or professional legal counsel.Use these resources to support informed, collaborative decisions while keeping each student's individual needs at the center.